Review: Admission

10:00 AM on 03.22.2013 // Matthew Razak
  @MatthewRazak

Not even worth applying for

Paul Rudd and Tina Fey! Well, I can get excited about this movie. Those two usually show up in comedies that are good. That Tina Fey is almost always funny and that Rudd fellow, well, he knows how to pick em'. This is clearly going to be a comedy with at least some witty repertoire because those two can banter with the best of them. Time to sit back and enjoy some laughs and a little romance.

Or be bored. That's another option.

Admission
Director: Paul Weitz
Rated: PG-13
Release Date: March 22, 2013 

It's hard to say at what point in Admission you realize you haven't really been laughing all that much. You see actors such as Rudd and Fey on the screen with Lilly Tomlin and other comedic legends and you think that you've been laughing because they're funny people. Then you realize you've only been snickering here and there, and that the jokes are about as bland as the film's oddly lackluster plot. There's supposed to be something to this, you keep thinking, but nothing ever comes.

The plot is a weird one. Portia Norman (Fey) is a college admissions councilor at Princeton who helps decide who to let in and who to deny. She is contacted by John Pressman (Rudd) about a student named Jeremiah (Nat Wolff), who he believes should not only get into Princeton, but is also Portia's son. Portia and John inevitably fall for each other as Portia's well controlled life begins to fall apart and she starts unfairly pushing for Jeremiah to get into Princeton. If you've ever applied to college and been rejected this latter plot point, which is a dominant part of the movie, won't be touching as it's supposed to be, but instead infuriating. 

Who knows why Princeton even allowed their name to be plastered all over this film since it makes their admissions program look horrible, and that is just one of the aggravating factors of the film that makes it dull all around. It's not the biggest one, though. Even a bad plot can be saved by good comedy, but Admission is strangely devoid of it. It's not like the comedy is bad, it's isn't even there. At times it seems we're supposed to simply laugh because Paul Rudd and Tina Fey are in the movie.

"Hey, look who's here," the film says excitedly as Rudd and Fey routinely attempt to make a stale screenplay humorous, "Why aren't you laughing at them?"

The strange thing is if the movie had met Rudd and Fey halfway they could have easily carried it. Both of them are fantastic onscreen and when the script does give them something to work with they make it work, but it routinely gives them nothing. You can almost see the frustration on Fey's face as she is once again asked to repeat a word multiple times because when you say something more than once it instantly becomes funny. Also instantly funny according to the film: foreign accents, old people having sex, social awkwardness and uncaring parents. It's as if the plot points for most romantic comedies got together and decided they could be funny without all the pesky comedy parts.

The film probably could have worked a whole lot better as a straight drama or at least a darker comedy. Instead of playing up the laughs of allowing a student into school it could have twisted its plot more easily into something a bit more serious and been far more effective. Instead it slumps along in the standard rom-com, feel good way, but without actually trying. So you've got a non-funny comedy coupled with a cursory look at the U.S. admissions process and neither work or are entertaining.

Boredom might be the worst thing to come out of a movie. If you're bad at least you're feeling something toward them film and if you're good, well, you're good. Boredom, however, is just nothing and, contrary to Seinfeld's claims, a show about nothing really isn't that interesting at all.


 Reblog (or) Blog Reply




THE VERDICT: 44/100

44
Admission - Reviewed by Matthew Razak

Subpar. I kind of want to like this movie, but I can't. It is not worth your time.


Matthew Razak, Editor-in-Chief
 Follow Blog + disclosure MatthewRazak Tips
Matthew Razak is the Editor-in-Chief here at Flixist meaning he get to take credit for all this awesome even though its really the rest of the amazing staff that gets it done. He started as a com... more   |   staff directory



Get more Flixist:   We're indie-run, blogging for the love of it, and our site will always be free. Optionally, you can support us and get: (1) Faster pages from our cloud server (3) Wide(r)screen (3) No big ads on Dtoid, Japanator, Tomopop, or Flixist (4) Auto contest entries, and (5) Dibs on betas & downloads. Try it out

 Setup email comments

Unsavory comments? Please report harassment, spam, and hate speech to our moderators, and flag the user (we will ban users dishing bad karma). Can't see comments? Apps like Avast or browser extensions can cause it. You can fix it by adding *.disqus.com to your whitelists.
advertisement:


Flixist's previous coverage:
Admission


  Jul 09

New Releases, week of 7/13/13: Street Trash Edition

Spring Breakers, Admission, Street Trash, and more on DVD/Blu-ray/VHS


  Nov 19

Trailer: Admission

I want to go to there.


View all:powered by:  MM.Elephant
Ads on Flixist may be purchased from:



Please contact Crave Online, thanks!





Back to Top


LET'S BECOME WEIRD NEIGHBORS - Please follow us on Facebook and Twitter
  Light Theme      Dark Theme
What is the meaning of life, and do you have any more pizza rolls?
You may remix all content on this site under Creative Commons with Attribution
- Living the dream, Since 2006 -