Quantcast
Review: Sucker Punch - FLIXIST
DestructoidJapanatorTomopopFlixist
REMOVE ALL ADS?
Guaranteed contest entry?
A new video show?
Something else?

Vote in our membership poll


Sucker Punch  


News & VideosGalleries

Review: Sucker Punch


10:00 AM on 03.25.2011
Review: Sucker Punch photo



I want to tell you a story about one of my dogs. Chewbacca was my mother’s dog through and through. You know how dogs are in a family. Sometimes, there’s just the one person that’s their person. That was Chewie and Mom. One night, I’m roused from my homework because my mother is screaming. I run into the bedroom to see what’s the matter, and I find Chewie, happy as can be, sitting on the floor. On my mother’s pillow is a dead rabbit, entrails hanging out like an effect in a Romero movie. My mom yelled at that dog that night, and he never really understood why. See, Chewie thought he had brought Mommy a present. Everything about it was good, to him.

That’s what Sucker Punch is: a dead rabbit brought in by a faithful, yet utterly stupid dog. He thinks it’s the bestest present in the whole world, but it’s just a stinking, dead corpse on your pillow.

Sucker Punch “concerns” itself with the plight of Baby Doll (Emily Browning), who has, through an unfortunate accident, found herself in an insane asylum. In five days, she will be lobotomized by a special doctor (Jon Hamm, doing nothing to dispel the notion that he’ll only be remembered for Mad Men). As a sort of defense mechanism, she imagines the insane asylum as a burlesque club/brothel, with the other girls as dancers, and the chief psychologist, Dr. Gorski (a cartoonish Carla Guigno), as a madame/dance instructor. Baby Doll decides to hatch a plan to free herself and the other girls before Jon Hamm comes to take her away. Preparing for the escape and acquiring the necessary items is shown through yet another layer of fantasy, this time featuring the ladies in skimpy outfits defying gravity, wielding swords, and taking down all manner of beasties. Dragons, clockwork zombies, robots, all the good stuff. Basically, someone took the sum total of every doodle from the back of a fourteen year old boy's notebook and put it in a blender.

The story is flimsy, and the characters are, every one, wafer-thin. The dialogue is lousy, especially when delivered by Scott Glenn’s Wise Man, who exists to give the gals their briefings in each fantasy mission and offer up solid-gold platitudes like, “Don’t let your mouth write checks your ass can’t cash.” The acting is either wooden like a door or, in the case of Oscar Issac, the orderly/club owner Blue, it’s straight out of high school “YOU CAN TELL I AM ACTING BECAUSE OF MY FACIAL EXPRESSIONS AND DICTION.” You walk into a movie like this, and you expect that. The action is what you’re going into the theater for.

Other than being legitimately visually inventive, with massive battles across varied dreamscape-y settings, the action is pretty drab. The movie has the same issue that most video games have: a ridiculously unvaried color scheme. Get ready to see a lot of the same shades of brown, grey, and green, because the way the camera shakes around like a child rolling down a hill, you won’t make sense of much! Of course, that's only when the camera isn't indulging in Snyder's signature speed-ramping crap, which more or less exists to get a damn good look at someone's legs as the fire weapons with a steely expression on their face. The set pieces are paced like a cruise ship, barreling on towards the end boss fight, watching Baby Doll dispatch whatever needs dispatching, then rolling back to the brothel reality. You’ll notice I’m using a fair amount of video game terminology here. That’s the best way to describe the frenetic action pieces. It’s like someone took a series of video game cutscenes and strung them together. Not the actual parts you get to play, mind you, because a certain level of interactivity might have made this interesting.

This film’s chief sin, though, is the awful, insulting message it brings. Just so we’re clear, I should mention first that this is not me reading between the lines or anything, possibly seeing something that’s not really there. This stems from lines in the script and words from the mouth of the director himself. You are led to believe that the film you are watching has a legitimate point to it. It wants to believe so wholeheartedly that it’s all about feminism and empowering women through action and general badassery. That’s ok. However, the only “empowering” that goes on is through their sexuality. This is the stated message of the film: empowering women by dressing them up in little to nothing. Wherever a panty shot is possible, we get three. Wherever there’s the chance for a young girl to wear something slinky, we get slinky and see-through. Every frame of action features a woman looking pouty and vulnerable hefting some big, phallic death object with precision, when they’re not getting battered around to an uncomfortable degree. In addition, nearly all of the main female characters are, ostensibly, in their twenties, but you take a look at the girl in the header, and you tell me she looks a day over sixteen. With the exceptions of Carla Guigno and Abbie Cornish, that’s how every single female looks. It’s two hours of jailbait torture/action-porn masquerading itself as neo-feminist.

I would be able to rate this higher if it was just dumb fun for the sake of dumb fun. Dumb fun is fine. There’s a place for it in cinema. Sometimes, entertainment can just be entertainment. However, Sucker Punch tries so, so hard to have a message that is only self-destructed by the weight of itself. There are coherent ideas here; they’re just odious and, frankly, deeply offensive. I honestly have to question whether or not Zack Snyder, who also co-wrote the film, has some serious issues with women. If any of you are justifying watching this for the hot ladies, here's a news flash; there is actual porn everywhere on the internet. For free! I just saved you $12 bucks.

I have been disgusted by the content of films. I’ve not agreed with the content of films. It’s a rare experience when I am actually offended by a film’s content. I have every hope that this film will be Zack Snyder’s Southland Tales, where Hollywood realizes it’s a terribly idea to give carte blanche to a hyperactive, middling talent. I weep for Superman’s future.

Jenika Katz

3.65 - When I first heard the buzz over Snyder calling this movie "empowering," I figured it was a botched attempt to give depth to a movie about women in little outfits kicking ass. There's nothing really wrong with that kind of movie if you just want some mindless entertainment. Instead, I got a movie about some guy's fetish for battered women with a "message" about fighting back being shoved down my throat. I'm supposed to draw inspiration from a bunch of overly made-up women who have to search deep down to find their secret weapons? Spoiler: it's their sexuality.

Liz Rugg

6.00 - Sucker Punch is fun to watch. It's fast, saturated, and constantly epic. The movie also seems heavily influenced by video game and anime culture and stylistic tendencies. But for a movie that is thematically about how the sexualization of women is bad, it just doesn't quite do enough to disillusion the viewer from the fact that throughout the movie, these women are always sexy. Always. The way that Sucker Punch tries to sucker punch you is by trying to point out that taking advantage of women is actually something that people should be ashamed of, but the movie kind of defeats itself in this agenda. I don't think Sucker Punch is a terrible movie, I think it tries really hard to be something inspirational and has great intentions. If you go into it looking to have fun, you'll have fun. If you go into it hoping to be empowered, well, it just doesn't make a smart enough of an argument.

Matthew Razak

5.20 - Sucker Punch doesn't all out suck, but it is far from the entertaining romp that it should be (at least for adolescent males). Crammed with everything you could ever think of as awesome the film is a cacophony of action and slow motion that never actually settles down into anything more enjoyable than a few amazing action shots. Snyder clearly wanted to make something that was full of everything he's ever seen on screen and thought was awesome. He succeeded. Unfortunately, the outcome isn't something that is enjoyable to watch.

Sean Walsh

4.35 - I spent a couple hours after seeing Sucker Punch last night trying to figure out what that bad taste in my mouth was, and I finally pin-pointed it: betrayal. Suddenly, I was in high school again, just a few days after finishing the novel Dreamcatcher by Stephen King, sitting in the theater opening night with rapt anticipation. The movie began, and I was in awe: it was perfect. Then, about half-way through, it all went wrong. It's like they only got the first half of the novel and had to make up the rest as they went along. I was crushed. It's not exactly the same story with Sucker Punch, but it's damn close. The first three quarters of the film or so were a visual treat, light on story, heavy on visuals, and it was pretty cool. Then, it's like Zack Snyder got a phone call asking if he wanted to make Superman and he decided "Eff this, I'm gonna make the most realistic Superman movie ever!" and just wrapped it up in a disappointing anti-climax of constantly bewildering choices in cinematic direction. There were cool things, like the steampunk German soldier zombies and heavily-armed shogun giants, but not even those gems could save me from the disappoint of Sucker Punch’s squandered potential. I have a lot more to say, but if I keep going, I may burst into tears.

35
While very few people may find this film entertaining, the vast majority will want to skip it altogether. Movies like this have very little redeeming value. Check out more reviews or the Flixist score guide.








Did you know? You can now get daily or weekly email notifications when humans reply to your comments.

Legacy Comments (will be imported soon)


Very well written review and one that is in line with everything I've been hearing about Sucker Punch since its been released. I had hoped it would at least be worth the ticket to see the interesting visuals and action, but the rest of the movie is sounding so crap that I'm not sure I want to spend the money anymore.
Never was appealing to me. I kind of got the jist from the terrible previews.
this really hurts my feelings. I was really hoping that this would be the movie to redeem Snyder :(
Needed more Ty Burrell.
"It’s two hours of jailbait torture/action-porn masquerading itself as neo-feminist."

That should be on the poster.
I was looking forward to seeing this, sneaking in a few beers to the movie theatres with my guy friends and having a jolly good time.

I will still be seeing this, sneaking in a few beers to the movie theatres with my guy friends and having a jolly good time. Except now I might bring extra beer.
I gotta stop reading reviews that Alex writes. They always shit all over movies I'll probably(or do) like. >.<
I need to watch it to know it's real.
I need to watch it to know it's real.
@Ramminchuck: Alex is a smart guy. Both of the Katzi are amazing people. But reviews are meant to be a helpful tool, not to discourage you. They reflect the personal preference of one particular person, and if your preferences are different than that person, well, you might disagree a lot with their reviews. When you see Sucker Punch, and if you like it, feel free to write us a blog about why!
Critically, I completely agree with Alex's review. However, I watch most movies to be merely entertained. For some people, entertainment can only be had with good movies. A good movie, Suckerpunch was not. A couple that went with us was disappointed because they'd expected a deep mind-screwing. The movie does punch you in the groin with their goofy morale but it was at least unique. So, entertainment-wise I agree more with Liz.
"but you take a look at the girl in the header, and you tell me she looks a day over sixteen."

i do tell you that she looks YEARS over 16! don't let Hollywood tell you what teenagers look like!
So I'm wondering if you actually watched this movie. You seem to have missed the very blatant point that Sweet Pea is telling you the story the whole time not Baby Doll and doing so from what it looked like in her drugged out view point after having finished the whole ordeal and escaping. You misquote the same line you're using to state that all the lines are terrible. You also greatly exaggerate, imho, the "torture porn" portion of the film. In fact I'd say even mentioning that genre at all is incorrect. It all falls easily within the punishment one expects in an "action porn" as you'd call it.

Is it well acted? No. Is it amazingly thoughtful? No. Directorial triumph of cinema? Not by a long shot. But it is great fun and not just another remake of yet another movie/tv show etc. Good for Snyder for taking risks and having fun, I hope to see a lot more of that come out of Hollywood.
@Thirdrise

I agree somewhat.

So I've just seen the movie yesterday, and I really enjoyed it.
It's not a big blockbuster by all means but it's a cool little genre movie. Snyder tryed really hard to blend all the action and the drama together and I can't say that he succeeded on the most part. But it's still a fun ride.

And above all I have to speak about the soundtrack. It's probably the best part of the movie! It's almost as if the action sequences are there to emphasize the music, instead of the other way around.

That beeing said .. if the music isn't you're cup of tea, you will miss out on a majority of what makes the movie tick.

All in all it's definetely not a movie for everyone .. but calling it a "stinking, dead corpse on your pillow." is a bit of a streatch.
I'm still going to go see it. My friend and I have been planning on it and we will not be dissuaded.

However, the bad reviews have brought my expectations down which might result in me enjoying the movie instead of being disappointed.

So, Thanks?
I really enjoyed this movie. I liked it so much that I may be willing to buy it on Blu-ray when it is brand new and expensive instead of waiting a few months for the price to drop. Emily Browning looks better in the film than on the posters which is quite an accomplishment.
Somebody so obviously agenda driven shouldn't be trusted with writing reviews. This is one of the darkest movies I have seen. It has also consumed 2 days of fairly intense analysis. Plus it adheres brilliantly to it's goal of replicating Heavy Metal Magazine circa 1982 (and it's depiction of fantasy genre women)-a point lost on the YGen author.

Yes it deals with black themes - generally in a stylistic and implied fashion. Yes it may not be to your modern Hollywood politically correct vanilla formula tastes. But don't fail by blinding yourself to the depth and underlying pathos of the movie by self righteous rage. it's amazing the purple passages I've read written by one dimensional critics of this film. It's as sad as listing to say classic music fans patting themselves on their backs by criticizing rap
Loved your review. I featured it in mine: http://www.actionmoviefreak.com/sucker-punch.html

4:00 PM on 05.23.2013

Timecop reboot coming, Van Damme missing

Universal Pictures has announced that it plans to reboot Timecop or maybe remake it or maybe just make another adaptation of the comic it was based on. Whatever the hell they're doing Jean-Claude Van Damme will not be in...

Matthew Razak

2:00 PM on 05.23.2013

Review: Fast & Furious 6

The Fast and Furious series started from humble beginnings and has since grown into the behemoth of explosions, familial bonds, fast cars, and wild stunts folks have grown to love over the years. Before it races into the futu...

Nick Valdez

3:00 PM on 05.22.2013

Trailer: Iceman 3D

Donnie Yen is going to have a crowded 2013, with three films coming out this year: the big-budget fantasy movie The Monkey King, the crime/martial arts yarn Special Identity, and Iceman 3D, a remake of the enjoyable 1989 fil...

Hubert Vigilla

8:00 AM on 05.22.2013

Trailer: Man of Steel

A new trailer dropped last night for Zack Snyder's Man of Steel. It uses the General Zod viral video as a starting point and builds out from it to showcase a little of the mayhem to come. Now, I might be in the vast minority...

Hubert Vigilla

6:00 PM on 05.20.2013

Peter Jackson's Hobbit back in production for pick ups

It's been a little while since we last heard about the next two Hobbit movies, The Desolation of Smaug and There and Back Again. Even though I had some issues with The Hobbit: An unexpected Journey (Matt, like the majority of...

Hubert Vigilla

10:00 AM on 05.20.2013

Assassin's Creed adaptation gets a release date

2015, a year packed to the brim with so much nerdy goodness with Star Wars: Episode VII, UMAS: 2015, Pitch Perfect 2, the Fantastic Four reboot, possible Justice League adaptation, possible Toy Story 4, Avatar 2...basically e...

Nick Valdez

8:00 AM on 05.17.2013

Crouching Tiger 2 to star Donnie Yen & Michelle Yeoh

Donnie Yen and Michelle Yeoh are set to star in the sequel to Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon, which is currently titled Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon II - The Green Destiny. Shooting will start in March 2014 with legendary f...

Hubert Vigilla

3:00 PM on 05.16.2013

Trailer: Pacific Rim

OK Pacific Rim, we get it. You're going to be awesome. This new trailer shows off even more robots punching monsters than we've seen before and it's hard to be anything but excited for this much robot on monster action....

Matthew Razak

5:00 PM on 05.15.2013

Trailer: Riddick

Following that super super short teaser from a few months back is the newest trailer for Riddick. There's not much plot to be found other than knowing Riddick is going to kill some guys and a lady, but there's plenty of nice...

Nick Valdez

11:00 AM on 05.14.2013

Schwarzenegger in talks for Toxic Avenger

The Toxic Avenger remake has been floating around for a while now with Steve Pink set to helm the film and Loyd Kauffman all about it as long as he gets paid. What we weren't all about were rumors that John Travolta...

Matthew Razak













timeline following:
Sucker Punch



4:00 PM on 02.07.2012
Flixist Awards 2011: Worst Movie

2011 wound up being a reasonably lackluster year for movies. There were a few greats, but by and large, there were a hell of a lot more middling movies. Also, there was a ton of crap. Adam Sandler seemed to devolve into ...more




More Reviews













View all Reviews





Back to Top


Advertising on Flixist is available: Please contact them to learn more