Tribeca Review: Nancy, Please[From April 19th to the 29th, Flixist will bring you live coverage of the 2012 Tribeca Film Festival in New York City. Keep an eye out for news, features, interviews, videos, and reviews of some of the most anticipated films to hit the festival circuit in 2012.] There is something inherently weird about psychodramas. Trying to delve in the psychology of a character seems like a fool's errand, especially in 90 minutes or less. But even so, it can't hurt to try. Nancy, Please makes an honest effort to justify the mental deterioration of its protagonist and simultaneously keep the audience from getting too alienated. But is it successful? Well... kind of.
Nancy, Please Paul Brawley (Will Rogers) has a problem with his old roommate. Her name is Nancy (Eleonore Hendricks), and she is crazy. When the film begins, he has just moved into a new house with his girlfriend, Jen (Rebecca Lawrence) but realizes he left something important back at the old place: his copy of Little Dorrit, by Charles Dickens. What's important isn't the book itself, however, but the notes inside of it. He tells everyone that the notes are irreplaceable, and that he cannot work on his dissertation without it. But Nancy won't give it back. And therein lies Paul's distress. The most interesting things that movies about mental deterioration can do is play with reality. They can use strange effects, depict hallucinations, and generally give a sense of visual (or aural) unease. Nancy, Please doesn't take advantage of that. Early in the film, Paul hears the sound of a squirrel in the wall. He goes up to it, and it seemed like the beginning of something. I didn't know what it meant or why it was a squirrel, but I felt like it was the beginning of his psychosis. Instead, it was just a squirrel. An actual thing that his girlfriend hears too. Eventually the squirrel becomes a physical thing that is utilized as part of Paul's insanity, but it's not the same thing. Only one scene really takes any advantage of the instability of its protagonist, and it's a wasted opportunity. The bigger issue is that Nancy, Please reveals an inherent flaw in narrative psychodramas: paranoia isn't real. In order for the film to actually depict deterioration, the antagonist cannot be an evil character. They are just a person. Sometimes they're bad, sure, and Nancy would fall into that category, but they are not out-and-out destructive. They aren't out to ruin anybody. Nancy is weird and a little bit crazy, but she has no interest in Paul and his troubles. He moved out, and she doesn't want to deal with him anymore. But Paul takes it so much further. He convinces himself that she is out there, plotting revenge for some unknown offense. But it can't be real, because if she is actually after him, then his madness is meaningless. He has every reason to be afraid, to occupy every moment with thoughts about this evil external force. In the end, it was about a guy who was being pursued and reacted in an unfortunate but understandable way.
But Nancy, Please isn't about that. It couldn't be. It's about the guy who has no idea what he's doing or what he has gotten himself into. His enemy is hardly an enemy at all. No, Nancy is not Paul's friend, and she definitely does go out of her way to be unhelpful, but as things start to fall apart, what initially seemed like overreactions become increasingly relatable. Paul's attempts to retrieve his book become less conventional and more creepy, although that's not something I really thought about until the credits rolled. However, when the big moment comes, and Paul confronts Nancy, things get really, really strange. Nancy's reaction borders on psychotic, and her outburst, while maybe a little justifiable, is off-putting. The entire film has set her up to be this kind of demon, and then it shows her to be something far less dangerous... until it shows her being actually physically dangerous. Maybe it's a script thing, or maybe Eleonore Hendricks didn't have the acting chops to pull the scene off, but there was something about the confrontation that was completely wrong. It did not work. It made everything that had led up to that moment less powerful in a pretty dramatic way. Which is really too bad, because there is some really good stuff there. Even if Paul's reactions are clearly delusional, his character is just sympathetic enough to make that okay. There were moments where I thought that Nancy really was out to get him, and I felt like I understood him. I had gotten into his psychology, the way that the filmmakers wanted me to. Those moments were sad, and I wanted everything to be okay for Paul. He's a nice guy who was put into a bad situation, and I wished that there was some way to help him. But his delusions got the better of him, and there was nothing anybody could do to stop it. Did you know? You can now get daily or weekly email notifications when humans reply to your comments.
8:00 PM on 05.24.2013 Trailer: Ain't Them Bodies SaintsIn Ain't Them Bodies Saints, Roony Mara and Casey Affleck star as a star-crossed couple on the lam, and it looks pretty intense. Also, as Dre brings up regularly on Flixist's podcast, Flixistentialism, Casey Affleck is dream...
9:00 AM on 05.24.2013 Gael Garcia Bernal to star in Jon Stewart's RosewaterBack in March we mentioned that Jon Stewart is going on hiatus at The Daily Show to direct his first feature film, Rosewater. The film is an adaptation of Maziar Bahari's book Then They Came for Me, a non-fiction account of B...
8:00 AM on 05.24.2013 Review: Before MidnightTo follow up Before Sunrise and Before Sunset, two of the best character pieces ever made, was always going to be a challenge. Keeping that quality and that momentum going into a third film made another nine years later ...
2:00 PM on 05.21.2013 Nymphomaniac to have actors's faces on porn star bodiesEven though many elements of Lars von Trier's Nymphomaniac have been closely guarded, a few details have slipped out from producer Louise Vesth. According to Vesth, there will be graphic sex scenes featuring actors Charlotte ...
1:00 PM on 05.20.2013 Trailer: The Young and Prodigious SpivetHere is the trailer for The Young and Prodigious Spivet, the latest from Amelie and City of Lost Children director Jean-Pierre Jeunet. The film is an adaptation of the book The Selected Works of T. S. Spivet by Reif Larsen, ...
2:00 PM on 05.17.2013 Trailer: LICKSDirected by newcomer Jonathan Singer-Vine, LICKS debuted at this year's SXSW. While Hubert, Matt, and I didn't get a chance to catch it, the film received some good acclaim. LICKS is about a young Oakland resi...
8:00 AM on 05.14.2013 International Trailer: The CongressHere is the international trailer for The Congress, the new film from Ari Folman (Waltz with Basir). This movie is loosely based on the novel The Futurological Congress by Stanislaw Lem (the author of Solaris) and stars Robi...
4:00 PM on 05.13.2013 Trailer: Captain PhillipsThe dramatic and thrilling ordeal of the Maersk Alabama was ripe for movie making the second it started splashing across news screens. The first American ship to be boarded by pirates since the 19th century? Navy Seals?...
1:00 PM on 05.10.2013 Trailer: August: Osage CountyAugust: Osage County is an upcoming movie from director John Wells based off of the acclaimed stage play of the same name by Tracy Letts. The family drama has a star-studded cast, from Meryl Streep in one of her more bitter ...
4:00 PM on 05.09.2013 Trailer: Baggage ClaimAnother day, another movie about a woman who needs to find a man in order to have a fulfilled life. In Baggage Claim, we follow a single flight attendant who, upon the announcement of her younger sister's engagement, decides...
|