dark        

Why that It remake isn't happening

0

Surprise! The studio wanted crap

Cary Fukunaga may be one of the most creative directors working now. Sin Nombre is truly stunning and his work on True Detective made the first season fantastic. However, we still don't know how he'd handle a bigger film, and thanks to his departure from New Line's two-part It remake we'll have to wait even longer. 

We all could have guessed why he left. He's an artistic minded filmmaker working for a studio who does horror in a very by-the-books way, but Fukunaga has confirmed that he basically wanted to makes something exciting and the studio wanted something traditional. 

“I was trying to make an unconventional horror film. It didn’t fit into the algorithm of what they knew they could spend and make money back on based on not offending their standard genre audience. Our budget was perfectly fine. We were always hovering at the $32 million mark, which was their budget. It was the creative that we were really battling. It was two movies. They didn’t care about that. In the first movie, what I was trying to do was an elevated horror film with actual characters. They didn’t want any characters. They wanted archetypes and scares. I wrote the script. They wanted me to make a much more inoffensive, conventional script. But I don’t think you can do proper Stephen King and make it inoffensive.”

Sounds like some pretty standard stuff when it comes to studios and directors parting ways, though New Line must have known what they were getting into when they brought him on the project. It's strange they'd second guess him and micro-manage, but the director says that's what they were doing. It's too bad as his vision for the remake actually sounds like it would make a remake of It worthwhile. 

“The main difference was making Pennywise more than just the clown. After 30 years of villains that could read the emotional minds of characters and scare them, trying to find really sadistic and intelligent ways he scares children, and also the children had real lives prior to being scared. And all that character work takes time. It’s a slow build, but it’s worth it, especially by the second film. But definitely even in the first film, it pays off.”

Yea, New Line, that just sounds horrible. No one would pay to see something interesting like that. I'd much rather have a scary clown killing a bunch of archetypes. Damn you, Hollywood. 

You are logged out. Login | Sign up

 
 

 

TwitterRedditEmailFacebook
 
Matthew Razak
Matthew RazakEditor-in-Chief   gamer profile

Matthew Razak is the Editor-in-Chief here at Flixist, meaning he gets to take credit for all this awesome even though its really the rest of the amazing staff that gets it done. He started as a c... more + disclosures


 


 


Also on Flixist: It   (10)   From our database:

  • Flixist on YouTube - Top 4 Rated R Movies with Kids - Nathan McVay
  • Jessica Chastain in talks to star in IT: Chapter Two - Chris Compendio
  • Is there any actor that you'll show up to the theater for? - Matthew Razak
  • IT sequel floats to a 2019 release after Labor Day - Drew Stuart
  • If you need to google a movie to understand it did it fail? - Matthew Razak
  • That IT clown rally in NYC is really some kind of crummy commercial/promotional stunt - Hubert Vigilla
  • New York clowns to protest IT over loss of business, a move that cannot possibly backfire - Hubert Vigilla
  • IT absolutely demolishes the box office in every way possible - Matthew Razak
  • Review: It - Rick Lash
  • More related stories
    Filed under... #directors #horror #industry

    READER COMMENTS LOADING BELOW...


    LET'S KEEP THE COMMUNITY GREAT


    You're not expected to always agree, but do please keep cool and never make it personal. Report harassment, spam, and hate speech to our community team. Also, on the right side of a comment you can flag nasty comments anonymously (we ban users dishing bad karma). For everything else, contact us!



     
     
  •